Egon Schiele Biography

Egon Schiele (1890-1918) was a man concerned with issues of innerity and death. Like other members of the Expressionist sweat of the early twentieth century, he was fascinated with making his mental processes open through his art. He wished to express his feelings more or less sexuality goly, rather than alluding to the shell as so many artists had done previously, artists such as Manet or Ingres. Instead, he took his cue from the influences of Rodin and Gustave Courbet, dealing with his take directly, as he does in the piece Nude with Green Turban (1914).But unlike Courbet, who dealt with his resign in an effort to shock and influence the staid French kinglike Academy, as in the case of LOrigine du Monde, 1866 (at right), Schiele explores the issue of sexuality in an attempt to express his own fascinations with the subject, irregardless of the opinions of others. In Nude with Green Turban, the subject is placed in a blank space. She is seemingly completely, so alone that there is nothing in the creative activity of the piece except her. Its as if the viewer is meant to go part of the immediacy of her result.Indeed, this may be what Schiele intends, having become lost in his own moment of artist to subject. Schiele owes much of this immediacy to Rodins innovation of the continuous line drawing, and Schiele employs the method here. He has sketched her quickly, capturing her in her moment before going back to fill in the details. However, he has provided completed the details selectively. Her shoes ar well rendered, as are the shadows and fullness of her thighs and hands. In the turban as well, he has completed the lower-ranking details of a knot, and filled it with the same color as the modify hes used as emphasis to the shadows her hands create.But her face is in haste done, her nose and closed eyes mere triangles. Her mouth is only the symbol of a mouth. Shes as if shes a puppet, expressionless with no individuality. In so doing, he has re moved the humanity from her, making her merely a be upon which her hands, and presumably the fantasies of the artist and viewer, play. Im sure an argument could be made about how this is an example of the objectification of women within the early twentieth century and before. History has for certain shown repeatedly how women in art are mere objects for the manful fantasy.What makes this incompatible is how Schiele has not created her as a prize for whomever owns her, just now has created her as an proceeds for his own fantasy (and, I should hope, for hers). However, right a look I dont conceive Schiele would be able to create such overt expressions of his fantasies without cries of outrage from the feminist community. Since the 1960s, women form progressed away from being objects and possessions, giving themselves a face and a join within the western world. Today, Schiele would be forced to give his model a face, and perhaps a name.While much of todays art is as direct in its subjects as Schieles art is, the mere suggestion of objectifying a woman in a sexual act is taboo. Instead, if Schiele were to give her a face, a name, and place her into a world other than the blank canvas of the viewers mind, she would become, in effect, real. In becoming a real woman, she would become an expression of womanhood not being afraid to be feminine. She would become part of the world women inhabit, able to be claimed by women as one of their own.As she is now, she is a fantasy, a creature of male sexual expression. Much of the art today seems to be concerned with issues of fantasy versus reality. With the advent of the internet, more and more deal are able to express their internal fantasies upon someone else. In this way, Schieles gain is extremely contemporary. People demand to lose themselves within images, feeling the ideas of the artist, but I do not believe that most art patrons urgency their art to be as obvious as Schieles.That said, I believe that S chieles themes of fantasy and sexuality would be more subtle today. People want the slow glow of accomplishment that they receive in correctly interpreting a piece of art. Direct sexuality is outre and todays public seems to prefer a more subtle approach. Nude with Green Turban is a prime example of Egon Schieles objectification of his subject, not out of line with the schema of the after-hours nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, portraying women as sexual objects of the male fantasy.With the womens movement of today, this theme would be handled in such a way as to include not only the male fantasy, but the effeminate fantasy as well, by removing her objectification. She would become more real. In addition, the sexual subject would be more subtle in an attempt to authorize all viewers, introducing an intellectualism that appeals to the female mind as well as the male, creating enamoredness out of perceived pornography.